Overview

Digital sovereignty applied to artificial intelligence

Digital sovereignty means keeping control of your data, your tools and your technology choices, without depending on a foreign provider or extraterritorial legislation. Applied to AI, it rests on three pillars: where the data lives, which regulation applies, and who controls the model.

The three pillars of sovereign AI

  • 1. Data location

    EU hosting alone does not determine the applicable jurisdiction. Assess contracting entities, subprocessors, support access and key control across the full processing chain.

  • 2. Regulatory compliance

    Two texts govern the use of AI in Europe: the GDPR (protection of personal data) and the AI Act (regulation of AI systems). A sovereign AI is designed to comply with both by construction, not as an afterthought.

  • 3. Control over the model

    The model (LLM) is open weight or open source, executed on your infrastructure. No black box, no telemetry, and no dependency on a vendor who could change its pricing or its terms.

Sovereign vs public AI: what really changes

✓ Sovereign AI Your data AI in the EU under your control Closed loop: nothing leaves your perimeter. ✗ Public AI (US) Your data Vendor servers (US) subject to the CLOUD Act Your data leaves the EU ↗
With sovereign AI the data stays in a closed, controlled perimeter. With public AI it goes to the vendor.
Sovereign AI and public AI (US) compared criterion by criterion
CriterionSovereign AIPublic AI (US)
Data locationEuropean UnionVendor servers (often US)
CLOUD ActNot applicablePossible exposure
Control over the modelFull (open weight)None (black box)
ReversibilityCompleteLimited
GDPR / AI Act documentationProvidedDepends on the vendor

Take back control of your AI

We deploy sovereign AI infrastructure for public bodies and organisations, with the compliance documentation ready for your DPO.

Responsibilities to validate

Documentation supports the controller and DPO for the actual processing. A public-interest task requires a legal basis in law and processing necessary for that task; it is not universal. A GDPR DPIA and an AI Act fundamental-rights impact assessment are distinct. Human oversight alone does not rule out high-risk classification.

CNIL: mission d’intérêt public