Sovereignty

The European regulation on AI: the AI Act

The EU AI Act is the first comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence anywhere in the world. It classifies AI systems by risk level and imposes proportionate obligations. Its provisions apply progressively, with key deadlines in 2026.

Informational content: this does not constitute legal advice.

The four risk levels

  • Unacceptable risk

    Prohibited (social scoring, manipulation and the like).

  • High risk

    Heavy obligations: risk management, human oversight, logging, registration. It covers in particular the assessment of eligibility for essential public services and benefits (annex III).

  • Limited risk

    Transparency obligation: tell users they are interacting with an AI, and label generated content. This is the case for a generic document assistant.

  • Minimal risk

    No specific obligation (spam filters and so on).

The decision point for a local authority

An AI document assistant is generally limited risk. But if it is used to process citizens' case files (income support, housing, welfare payments), it can shift into high risk (annex III §5a).

Good practice: settle that use in writing in a usage charter, and either frame it or exclude it explicitly. We support you through that decision.

Key obligations & deadlines

Key obligations of the AI Act and the related reference or deadline
AI literacy (training users)art. 4
Transparency: “AI-generated content”art. 50 · 2026
Documented human oversighthigh-risk systems
Obligations for general-purpose AI models (GPAI)borne by the model provider

What a sovereign AI brings

  • Transparency banner and labelling of generated content
  • Logging and human oversight made easier (logs and histories stay within the deployment's perimeter)
  • Technical documentation of the system provided
  • Usage charter designed with you to frame the risk level

Official sources

Get ahead of the 2026 deadlines

See also GDPR compliance and digital sovereignty.

Responsibilities to validate

Documentation supports the controller and DPO for the actual processing. A public-interest task requires a legal basis in law and processing necessary for that task; it is not universal. A GDPR DPIA and an AI Act fundamental-rights impact assessment are distinct. Human oversight alone does not rule out high-risk classification.

CNIL: mission d’intérêt public (in French) (new window)

Timeline and classification: 12 October 2026

The Commission lists 2 December 2027 for Annex III high-risk systems and 2 August 2028 for systems integrated into relevant Annex I products. These dates are set by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the “Digital Omnibus on AI”), published in the Official Journal of the EU on 24 July 2026 and in force since 27 July 2026. The Article 50 transparency obligations have applied since 2 August 2026; providers of AI systems, including general-purpose AI systems, that generate synthetic audio, image, video or text content and were placed on the market before that date have until 2 December 2026 to comply with the content marking required by Article 50(2) (new Article 111(4) of the AI Act). Other duties, including AI literacy, have their own dates. Assess purpose, provider or deployer role, exceptions to prohibitions and Annex I and III criteria separately.

European Commission: AI Act (new window) · EUR-Lex: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (new window)